In a tax context, ADR has now been around for a few years but is not used much. In 2017/2018, there were only 612 ADR applications. ADR in the context of tax generally means a mediation service whereby an impartial third party can try to move on arguments between HMRC and the tax payer which have become entrenched and unproductive. This will often involve a HMRC mediator (therefore some people question the impartiality!) who will sit between a professional firm and HMRC to try to move ‘road blocks’ to arguments.
After correspondence with HMRC reaches a certain point in broad terms a client must decide to put up or shut up. ‘Put up’ here means stumping up for the costs of a first tier tribunal. This can be extremely expensive and clearly there are no guarantees that the client will get the result that they want. ‘Shut up’ here means conceding to HMRC’s position. ADR can come in here as a handy last ditch attempt to close an enquiry (favourably) without the need for a tribunal. The main pros and cons are as follows:
From a cost/benefit analysis if HMRC and a client do not see eye to eye over a particular tax issue, ADR should be worth a punt. The best case scenario will be that HMRC will change its stance and the worst case will be that a case proceeds to tribunal but the client’s representative has a clearer understanding of HMRC’s stance – which can only be a good thing.
You can use this form to request us to give you a call or if you prefer just leave us a message. Please be sure to leave us a contact number or email address for you and we will get back to you as soon as we can.